G Guru DNA Investor Style
Q1 2025 · 13F
GURU PROFILE · Q1 2025 · 13F-HR Standard
DF

David Jeffrey Fear — concentrated value

Thunderbird Partners, run by David Fear, holds a concentrated book with an outsized healthcare position and a very high contrarian reading.

Thunderbird Partners
Positions
7
Avg Annual Return, 5 yr
+55,5%
Alpha vs S&P 500, Annual
+37,0%
Max Drawdown
−32,4%
Sharpe (5 yr)
1,48

DNA Fingerprint

6 axes · Q1 2025
255075100VALUE63RISK78CONCENTRATION89TURNOVER98QUALITY10CONTRARIAN90
Q1 2025 (latest)

Style Traits

  • Value Value / Growth
    63 +14 since Q1 2024

    Growth Value

  • Risk Risk Appetite
    78 −18 since Q1 2024

    Low High

  • Concentration Portfolio Focus
    89 +12 since Q1 2024

    Diversified Focused

  • Turnover Trading Activity
    98 +48 since Q1 2024

    Long-term Active

  • Quality Profitability
    10 −60 since Q1 2024

    Speculative Profitable

  • Contrarian Contrarianism
    90 +40 since Q1 2024

    With Crowd Against Crowd

Methodology

Each axis is a percentile rank from 0 to 100 relative to the profiled guru cohort; 50 is the cohort midpoint. The higher the value, the stronger the trait. The dashed overlay is the median shape of the guru's behavioral peer group, so you can read where this investor is unusual within their own style. The Trajectory arrows trace the drift from four quarters ago to now — an illustration of the method over a short window, not a statistical claim.

  • Value (Value / Growth) — how cheaply the portfolio's stocks are priced versus the market, by valuation multiples (e.g. price-to-earnings). A higher score means cheaper, value-style picks; a lower score means pricier, growth-style bets the market expects to grow fast.
  • Risk (Risk Appetite) — how much price volatility and business fragility the portfolio carries. A higher score means bolder, more volatile holdings (think biotech or meme stocks); a lower score means defensive, steady names like utilities and staples.
  • Concentration (Portfolio Focus) — how much of the portfolio sits in its few largest positions. A higher score means a focused book of big convictions; a lower score means bets spread thinly across many names.
  • Turnover (Trading Activity) — how much the lineup of holdings changes from one quarter to the next. A higher score means an active trader rotating names in and out; a lower score means a patient, buy-and-hold roster.
  • Quality (Profitability) — how profitable and financially solid the businesses in the portfolio are. A higher score means durable, profitable companies; a lower score means speculative or pre-profit bets.
  • Contrarian (Contrarianism) — how often the guru's trades go against what the other gurus are doing. A higher score means buying what the crowd sells and vice versa; a lower score means moving with the consensus.

Extended DNA

Beyond the radar's six: two further behavioral reads — whether new buys add to existing holdings or start fresh, and the size of companies the book favors — on the same 0–100 cohort-percentile scale.

  • Follow-On Buying — Of the quarter's buys, the share that add to tickers already held rather than open fresh positions. A higher score means doubling down on existing convictions; a lower score means spreading into new bets.
  • Size Bias — Whether the book tilts toward large, easy-to-trade companies or smaller, thinly-traded ones — gauged from each holding's trading liquidity, which stands in for company size rather than measuring market cap directly. A higher score means large, liquid mega-caps; a lower score means smaller, less-liquid names.
  • Conviction Follow-On Buying
    14 −36 since Q1 2024

    New bets Adds to conviction

  • Size Size Bias
    54 +3 since Q1 2024

    Small-cap Large-cap

DNA Anomalies

2 deviations · basis Q1 2024–Q4 2024
GURU PATTERNBOUGHT · LARGERSOLD · LARGERSOLD · SMALLERBOUGHT · SMALLERsoldboughtlargersmallerUNHCIWDCHUMNTES
Dot colour — type of deviationConcentration / contrarianMomentumOther positions (no deviation)5% of portfolio
What deviated from pattern
UNHCINTES
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated · The Cigna Group · NetEase, Inc.
Risk appetite: a notable shift toward lower risk — 1.8σ below its 5-quarter norm (90→78). Led by CI, UNH, NTES.
WDCHUM
Western Digital Corporation · Humana Inc.
Contrarian index: a notable shift further against the crowd — 1.7σ above its 4-quarter norm (34→90). Led by NTES, WDC, HUM.

Backtest · Cost of Delay

real 13F delay vs S&P 500
Cost of Delay

Copying with the real 13F publication delay costs  99,9 pp of return over 2 years.

Guru (2 years)
+161,1%
Copier (13F)
+61,2%
S&P 500
+44,6%
60100140180220260261161145Q2 ’24Q3 ’24Q4 ’24Q1 ’25Q2 ’25Q3 ’25Q4 ’25Q1 ’26Q2 ’26DELAY SPREAD

Managers with assets above $100M disclose positions in Form 13F-HR within 45 days after quarter end. The backtest runs three $100,000 portfolios: the guru rebalances at quarter-end prices, the copier mirrors the same weights on the actual filing date, and S&P 500 is the benchmark.

The hatched area is the cost of delay: the difference in cumulative returns between the guru and the copier in percentage points. The delay is not always a disadvantage — if a stock fell between quarter end and the filing date, the copier buys in cheaper.

The guru curve is also a model: 13F shows only long positions in US equities at quarter end, without intra-quarter trades, shorts, or cash. Commissions, slippage, and taxes are not accounted for.

Notable Signals

synthesis metrics
This quarter
CI

Adding to The Cigna Group

+11.7pp in CI this quarter — the book's largest single weight change.

Big move
Single-name conviction
UNH

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated anchors the book at 46.3%

A 46.3% weight in a single name — concentration that makes UNH the book's center of gravity.

Conviction
Concentration × Turnover

Concentrated but restless

A concentrated book that still trades heavily — big convictions held with a quick trigger (concentration 89/100, turnover 98/100 vs peers).

Style tension
Value × Quality

Cigar-butt deep value

Among the cohort's deepest value books, but low on quality — classic distressed-value hunting (value 63/100, quality 10/100 vs peers).

Style tension
Risk × Quality

Swinging for the fences

High risk appetite with low quality scores — the boom-or-bust end of the cohort (risk 78/100, quality 10/100 vs peers).

Aggressive

Top 7 Positions

of 7 · Q1 2025
Ticker Company Δ for quarter Weight
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated −9,2
46,3%
ILMN Illumina, Inc. −6,9
12,4%
CI The Cigna Group +11,7
11,7%
WDC Western Digital Corporation +11,6
11,6%
HUM Humana Inc. +10,0
10,0%
SNDK Sandisk Corporation +4,6
4,6%
NTES NetEase, Inc. +3,3
3,3%